For RTO owners & managers

Same assessors. Marking turned around faster.

Apollo drafts the marks, so your assessors spend their time deciding, not looking things up. Marking comes back sooner.

Marking the pile yourself? See the page for trainers →
11.25min
minutes saved per assessment (one trainer)
≈187hrs
hours saved per 1,000 assessments, based on one trainer
24
assessments in the timed batch

Based on one trainer’s timed batch of 24, against her own estimate by hand. Your numbers will differ. Method here.

01 / What changes operationally

Where the change shows up.

01

Results land inside the term

Marks come back while the unit is still fresh, so resubmissions are worth doing. Fewer chase-ups for you.

02

Lower marking labour cost

About 11 minutes saved per assessment, or 187 hours per 1,000. Based on one trainer, not a guarantee.

03

The same guide for every learner

Once each task’s guide is checked, every assessor marks against it. Comments quote the student, so reviewers can see why.

04

Capacity without recruiting

Each assessor gets through more marking, so you may be able to take on the next class with the team you have.

05

Assessors who stay

Marking at home on a Sunday wears good assessors down. Give that time back and they’re more likely to stay.

06

Learn from the batch

See which tasks and questions keep tripping learners up, so you can improve them. More →

“It has significantly reduced my marking time and workload while helping me maintain consistent, quality feedback for students.”
Trainer · Queensland RTO · Read the full testimonials →
02 / Quality of delivery

Quicker, without thinning out the feedback.

Faster marking usually means thinner feedback. Not here: the feedback is drafted while there’s time to do it properly.

Evidence-linked

Feedback that quotes the evidence

Comments quote what the student wrote, so anyone can see why a mark was given.

Unit Cross-Check

Weak instruments flagged early

Apollo reads your unit’s documents side by side and shows you gaps before an auditor finds them. See the Unit Cross-Check →

Integrity

Unusual similarity surfaced in the same pass

Shows answers in the class that look unusually alike, for you to read. It doesn’t search the internet.

03 / Where it fits

Built for written assessment.

Used so far on business, management and project management units. It works with your assessment tools as they are.

Tested so far
01Business
02Management & leadership
03Project management
Assessment types it reads
01Knowledge questionsShort and long written answers
02Essays & reportsWord or PDF
03Projects & case studiesMulti-part tasks with templates
04Scenario responsesWorkplace plans, emails and memos
05Excel workbooksBudgets, registers and tables

Built for written assessments in courses like:

Business and management
  • Certificate IV in Business
  • Diploma of Business
  • Diploma of Project Management
  • Diploma of Leadership and Management
Community services and early childhood
  • Certificate III in Individual Support
  • Certificate III in Early Childhood Education and Care
  • Diploma of Community Services
Training and education
  • Certificate IV in Training and Assessment
  • Diploma of Vocational Education and Training
Finance
  • Certificate IV in Accounting and Bookkeeping
  • Diploma of Accounting
Work health and safety
  • Certificate IV in Work Health and Safety
  • Diploma of Work Health and Safety
Information technology
  • Certificate IV in Information Technology
  • Diploma of Information Technology
Hospitality, tourism and logistics
  • Diploma of Hospitality Management
  • Diploma of Travel and Tourism Management
  • Diploma of Logistics
Government and property
  • Certificate IV in Government
  • Certificate IV in Real Estate Practice

Only the written parts of each course, such as knowledge questions, case studies, reports and plans. Not work placement, observed or hands-on tasks.

Where it doesn’t fit: practical observations, role plays, workplace demonstrations, hands-on trade skills, creative or artistic work, or oral assessments. Apollo only reads written work.

Your course not listed? If learners submit written work and you have a marking guide, talk to us.

04 / What gets asked in the meeting

The ones that come up every time.

01

Is AI deciding competency?

No. Apollo drafts. Your assessor decides and signs off, and nothing can be downloaded until they do.

02

How does it learn our assessments?

From the documents you already have: your marking guide and sample answers. Your assessor checks each task’s setup, then it’s reused for every learner.

03

Can it handle a whole cohort?

Yes. Large batches are normal, and that’s where most of the time is saved. Each task is set up for the unit, not per learner.

04

What does it need from IT?

Nothing. Assessors sign in at my.apolloedu.au in their browser. No install, no keys, no setup work.

05

Where does student data go?

Names and IDs are removed automatically. Check the preview, because it can miss some (like handwriting). The work, with names removed, and your marking guide go to our AI provider, Anthropic, outside Australia. Apollo doesn’t keep learner work after sign-off. Written up for your compliance officer.

“I see the app as a tool to support the trainer’s professional judgement rather than replace it.”
Trainer & Assessor · Queensland RTO
Watch · 50 seconds

What Apollo removes before marking.

Names and IDs are removed automatically, but it can miss handwriting. The assessor checks the preview and covers anything missed.

Press play · demo data, fictional RTO
my.apolloedu.au
05 / Responsible AI

Where Apollo fits under ASQA’s principles.

ASQA has set out five principles for using AI in VET. Each is below, with Apollo’s part in plain terms.

ASQA principle 1

Governance, quality and integrity

Where Apollo fits

No drafts until the task’s marking guide is loaded and checked.

ASQA principle 2

Human oversight and accountability

Where Apollo fits

Nothing can be downloaded until the assessor signs off. Their name and the time go on the document.

ASQA principle 3

Privacy, data protection and security

Where Apollo fits

Apollo doesn’t keep learner work. Names and IDs, including labelled USIs, are removed automatically. Check the preview, because it can miss some (like handwriting). The work, with names removed, and the marking guide go to our AI provider, Anthropic, outside Australia. Details for your compliance officer.

ASQA principle 4

Equity and accessibility

Where Apollo fits

Learners don’t use Apollo or log in to it. They submit exactly as they do now.

ASQA principle 5

Training, industry and student needs

Where Apollo fits

Drafts use your own tasks and marking guide, not a generic rubric. The Unit Cross-Check can also check your assessment documents against the unit’s elements and performance criteria, when you add its specification.

Headings from ASQA’s infographic; read the principles in full on ASQA’s website. The Apollo lines are our own, not reviewed or endorsed by ASQA. Using Apollo doesn’t make an RTO compliant: your RTO stays responsible for meeting the principles, through its own policies, governance and self-assurance.

06 / Rolling it out

There’s nothing to migrate.

Beside

Works beside your systems

Your SMS, LMS and templates stay as they are. Apollo takes your files and gives back marked documents.

Set-up

Set up with your team

Each assessor signs in at my.apolloedu.au. Nothing to install. AI included.

Readable

Costs you can read

A quote for your RTO, AI included, based on your team and volume. See pricing →

Governed

No learner work to govern

Apollo doesn’t keep learner work after sign-off. Your data →

Get a quote shaped to your RTO.

Tell us how many assessors you have and how much marking you do. We’ll send a quote that fits.